Previous 39 / 66 Next

do not adequately support needed improvements in teaching and learning * ** * lack public credibility, for all of these reasons.” The preface to the 1999 annual report prepared by the Regents and the SED finds that:

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State of New York

Judgments

Preview

Country

United States of America

Rights Involved

Right to education

Issue

Resource expenditure

National Court

New York State Court of Appeals

Date: Jun 26, 2003

Summary: On appeal, the Court here affirmed the New York Supreme Court’s findings, affirming that New York City public schools did not provide the constitutionally required minimum level of a “sound basic education,” and that this failure was, at least in part, the result of inadequate funding by New York State. They therefore ordered the State to remedy this problem, giving until July 30, 2004 to determine the cost of providing a sound basic education in New York City and enact appropriate reforms. The Court rejected the State’s “comparative spending” argument, stating that a mere showing that the State’s per-student expenditure levels for NYC schools were higher than the U.S. average did not prove that the standard of a sound basic education was being met. With respect to expenditure figures, reference must be made to student need, local costs, and the actual quality of educational inputs and outputs.

Primary Documents

1 No. 74: Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc., et al. v. The State of New York, et al..pdf
English
Download View

Resourcing Rights

Select target paragraph3

Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State of New York

Primary Documents

Notifications