MOKGORO J
range demonstrates the speculative nature of the calculations, but even if they
are taken as providing the best guide of what the cost may be, they do not
support the contention that there will be a huge cost in making provision for
permanent residents. Approximately one fifth of the projected expenditure is in
respect of child grants and the unconstitutionality of the citizenship
requirement in that section of the Act has already been conceded by the
respondents. The remainder reflects an increase of less than 2% on the present
cost of social grants (currently R26.2 billion) even on the higher estimate.
Bearing in mind that it is anticipated that the expenditure on grants will, in any
event, increase by a further R18.4 billion over the next three years without
making provision for permanent residents, the cost of including permanent
residents in the system will be only a small proportion of the total cost.
Self-sufficiency
[63]
Another reason given for excluding permanent residents from the
scheme was the promotion of the immigration policy of the state, which seeks
to exclude persons who may become a burden on the state and thereby to
encourage self-sufficiency among foreign nationals.
[64]
Limiting the cost of social welfare is a legitimate government concern.
If it is considered necessary to control applications for permanent residence by
excluding those who may become a burden on the state, that too is permissible,
but it must be done in accordance with the Constitution and its values. The
39
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents