Chapter 1 | Page 20 involves analysis at different levels of State practice within the ESC rights framework. Another key consideration is that the thesis addresses fundamental and multifaceted issues related to resource mobilisation, allocation and governance using the parameters of social interests, judicial considerations and public choice. This requires detailed analysis of existing policies and related issues. Thus, the underpinning research paradigm not only reflects the legal doctrines of interpretation of the text of the ICESCR and aspects of human rights practice, but also builds on current knowledge of the application of international law in the domestic policy environment, particularly in economic and development policy areas relevant to the research question. The methodological approaches, types of data and data analysis, as well as the background for the case studies are described below. 1.4.1 Methodological approaches The choice of quantitative or qualitative research methods (or a combination of both) is a vital consideration in any research plan. Quantitative research methodologies are mainly concerned with quantification of the properties, states, characters and comparisons of the phenomenon,41 whereas qualitative research focuses on generating in-depth understanding and underlying meaning of the properties and characteristics of the research object.42 While both methodologies have their appeal for human rights research, the present study is best suited to a qualitative methodology. First, it focuses on a subjective dimension of State practice with regard to interpretation and practice of human rights obligations in general rather than on human rights violations alone. Secondly, the specific questions related to State practice in 41 Adri Labuschagne, 'Qualitative Research - Airy Fairy or Fundamental?' (2003) 8(1) The Qualitative Report. 42 Ibid.