Luco Njagi & 21 others v Ministry of Health & 2 others [2015] eKLR REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CONSTITUTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION PETITION NO. 218 OF 2013 (CONSOLIDATED WITH PETITION NO. 451 OF 2013) L N & 21 OTHERS………………………………..…………... PETITIONERS VERSUS THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH……………………………….…………1ST RESPONDENT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL………………………..………..2ND RESPONDENT NATIONAL HOSPITAL INSURANCE FUND………………….……3RD RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Introduction 1. The consolidated petitions in this matter, Nos. 218 and 451 of 2013, bring to the fore the challenges facing the health sector in Kenya and the difficulties citizens face in accessing adequate health care. Petition No. 218 of 2013 2. The petitioners in Petition No. 218 of 2013 are L N, H M, P N, E B N, J M, J N K, H M, A M, S W, J M, B K, M K, E C, D M, J N N, S K, A N, R K, S M, J M and J G. 3. They filed their petition under certificate of urgency seeking mandatory orders to compel the Ministry of Health to meet the cost of medical dialysis on their behalf at eight private medical facilities namely the Nairobi Hospital, the Nairobi Women’s Hospital, The Aga Khan, MP Shah, Mater, Nairobi West and Karen hospitals, and at the Parklands Dialysis Centre, or to subsidise the cost of medical dialysis at the named private medical facilities at the rate at which the petitioners would have accessed treatment at Kenyatta National Hospital. 4. The basis for seeking these orders is that the petitioners, all suffering from renal failure, have been undergoing renal dialysis at the Kenyatta National Hospital which had 20 machines for this purpose but only 6 were available to serve all patients who require renal dialysis, and that the hospital gave preference to in-patients. It is their case that they could not afford healthcare from other service providers and their rights to health had been infringed. They submit that require http://www.kenyalaw.org - Page 1/18

Select target paragraph3