Previous 1 / 8 Next

The Use of Maximum Available Resources Article 2 & Governments’ Budgets Article 2 & Governments’ Budgets Expenditures on items that are not effective in guaranteeing rights

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

The Use of Maximum Available Resources: Article 2 and Governments' Budgets; Expenditures on items that are not effective for guaranteeing rights

Articles and Commentary

Preview

Authors: Ann Blyberg, Helena Hofbauer

Rights Involved

Right to adequate housing

Issue

Participation
Resource expenditure
Transparency

Year: 2014

Summary: Examines case study demonstrating that the obligation to use MAR to progressively realize ESC rights implies a government duty to do its utmost, within the funding available to it, to ensure that the plans, programs and projects it intends to implement are those most likely to realize people’s rights. Residents of chronically damp and cold social housing facilities in a neglected region of Northern Ireland had requested superior heating systems. The Northern Ireland Housing Executive, the state entity that manages the facilities, ignored their requests but approved a far more costly cladding project that would preserve the building's exterior, but would not address residents' concerns. To realize the right to habitability and affordability of social housing, is not enough for government to spend money on housing--it must choose projects and designs that are most likely to have the effect of realizing people’s rights.

Primary Documents

Articel 2 project - Expenditures on items that are not effective for guarenteeing rights.pdf
English
Download View

Resourcing Rights

Select target paragraph3

The Use of Maximum Available Resources: Article 2 and Governments' Budgets; Expenditures on items that are not effective for guaranteeing rights

Primary Documents

Notifications