A/HRC/28/59/Add.1
rendered 100 decisions, including overturning 39 administrative decisions in favour of the
claimants.12
17.
In addition, the Complaints Committee on Transactions with Financial Firms and the
Insurance Complaints Committee under the Financial Supervisory Authority deal with
disputes between consumers and banks, credit institutions and insurance companies. Private
individuals pay a fee of ISK 5,000 or ISK 6,000, respectively, when submitting a complaint
to those committees. The fee is reimbursed if the complaint is wholly or partly accepted.13
Iceland’s international human rights commitments
C.
18.
In 2012, during its universal periodic review by the Human Rights Council, Iceland
undertook several commitments to strengthen its human rights protection system, including
considering the ratification of the Optional Protocols to the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and to the Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment and actively examining the
possibility of establishing a national human rights institution compliant with the Paris
Principles (see A/HRC/19/13/Add.1, paras. 4, 5, and 16).
19.
In early 2013, the Ministry of the Interior drafted a National Action Plan on Human
Rights, which included the establishment of a human rights institution. However, to date,
the plan has not yet been submitted to the Parliament. Iceland thus remains one of the few
European countries that does not have an independent human rights institution, although
international and regional human rights mechanisms have recommended the establishment
of such a body for a number of years.14 The Commissioner for Human Rights of the
Council of Europe recently highlighted the important role that national human rights
institutions and other human rights protection bodies could play in the context of economic
crises.15 The time has come to fill that gap. Based on their current legal mandates, neither
the Althing Ombudsman nor the Ombudsman for Children can fulfil the role of a national
human rights institution. While the Icelandic Human Rights Centre carries out many
activities similar to those of human rights institutions in other countries, it lacks the
required legal status and adequate and stable funding to fully carry out such a task.
III. Iceland’s response to the banking crisis: adjustment with
a more human face
A.
The banking collapse
20.
The majority of Iceland’s banks were privatized between 1991 and 2004, and a
floating exchange rate was introduced. Icelandic banks expanded rapidly during the 2000s
owing to a combination of uncontrolled risk taking, a strong Icelandic currency exchange
rate and very favourable conditions on international financial markets, which enabled them
12
13
14
15
8
The decisions taken by those committees are available from www.velferdarraduneyti.is/kaerunefndir/.
See http://en.fme.is/supervision/consumer-affairs/.
See CAT/C/ISL/CO/3, para. 6; CEDAW/C/ICE/CO/6, para. 239; CERD/C/ISL/CO/19-20, para. 13;
CCPR/C/ISL/CO/5, para. 5; E/C.12/ISL/CO/4, para. 7; A/HRC/26/39/Add.1, para. 100; Council of
Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, CommDH(2005)10, paras. 24–29 and 62.
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Safeguarding human rights, (see note 3 ),
pp. 12, 54–55.