A/HRC/28/59/Add.1
majority in Parliament and therefore they could not be examined by the High Court of
Impeachment. The former Prime Minister was cleared by the High Court of most of the
charges, but sentenced for failing to call emergency meetings, as provided for under the
Constitution. He has appealed to the European Court of Human Rights where his case is
still under consideration.
E.
Reform of banking supervision
39.
The Special Investigative Commission also noted the failure of the supervisory
authorities to foresee the crisis. In its report, it concluded that the Financial Supervisory
Authority (FME), the institution that bore the main responsibility for monitoring the
activities of the banks, had not grown in proportion to the banks and its practices had not
kept up with the rapid change in banking practices. Failings of FME included insufficient
expertise to carry out its statutory supervisory tasks, as well as a lack of assertiveness when
it discovered that regulated entities did not comply with applicable laws or regulations. In
response to violations of the law, only written comments were provided to the relevant
financial corporations; the issues were not examined through the proper legal channels, nor
did the authorities try, in a decisive way, to prevent the collapse and to reduce the size of
the balance sheets of Icelandic banks, after 2006. The Special Investigative Commission
also detailed the failure of the Board of Governors of the Central Bank of Iceland and the
Ministers responsible to inform each other appropriately or to act adequately on
information indicating that urgent action was required. It concluded that, in addition to the
former Prime Minister, the Ministers of Finance and Business Affairs, the Director General
of FME and three Governors of the Central Bank had shown negligence.22 In addition, FME
staff were frequently recruited from their supervisory functions directly into more lucrative
jobs in financial institutions whose operations they were previously required to supervise,
thereby undermining the ability of FME to perform its functions.
40.
In the aftermath of the crash, the Government implemented a range of reforms
aimed at enhancing the supervisory capacities of FME.23 FME also assisted in the
investigation of 205 cases relating to alleged violations prior to the 2008 banking collapse,
referring 103 cases of bankers to the Office of the Special Prosecutor, for further action.24
41.
Iceland should implement the recently passed European banking legislation in order
to further strengthen the system of banking supervision. The Financial Stability Council,
composed of representatives of the Ministry of Finance, the Central Bank and FME, seeks
to adequately monitor the macro-financial situation of the country in order to take timely
decisions. As the Parliament played a crucial role in identifying the causes of the financial
crisis, one would think that it should play a role in the Financial Stability Council, either by
including a parliamentary representative on the Council or by ensuring citizens’ oversight
of the Council through a parliamentary committee.
22
23
24
14
Iceland, Report of the Special Investigative Commission (Reykjavik, 2010), chapter 21, Causes of the
Collapse of the Icelandic Banks – Responsibility, Mistakes and Negligence, available from
www.rna.is/media/skjol/RNAvefurKafli21Enska.pdf.
See, for example, “Future Structure of the Icelandic Financial System”, report of the Minister of the
Economy to the Althingi (March 2012), pp. 63–77, 101–102.
Iceland, Annual Report of the Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) 2013 (Reykjavik, 2013), p. 9.