MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT – JOINT DISSENTING OPINION 24
OF JUDGES Sir John FREELAND AND JUNGWIERT
5. As to the first of these questions, it is in our view intrinsic to the
notion of a “legislature” that the body concerned should have the power to
initiate legislation and to adopt it (subject, in the case of some national
Constitutions, to the requirement of the assent of the head of State). If this
power is lacking, the fact that the body may have other powers often
exercisable by national legislatures (for example, powers in relation to
censure of the executive or to the budget) is not enough to remedy the
deficiency. The existence of such other powers may enhance the body’s
entitlement to be styled as a parliament and its role in promoting an
“effective political democracy”. But the facts that it is so styled and has
such a role are not to be regarded as requiring it to be treated as a
“legislature” unless it has in itself the necessary legislative power.
6. With the vestigial and for present purposes insignificant exception of
its power under Article 95(3) of the European Coal and Steel Community
Treaty, the European Parliament has no power to initiate and adopt
legislation. Even in the case of the so-called co-decision procedure
(Article 189b) introduced by the Maastricht Treaty – a procedure to which
much significance was attached on behalf of the applicant –, while the
European Parliament has potential influence on the content of legislation
and a power to block legislation to which it objects, it has neither the sole
right to adopt legislation nor the power to force the Council to adopt
legislation which the Council does not want. Nor does the procedure
provide the Parliament with any opportunity to initiate legislation itself.
7. Thus, even if, as paragraph 50 of the judgment says, the Maastricht
Treaty’s removal of the words “advisory and supervisory” to describe the
powers of the European Parliament “must be taken as an indication that the
European Parliament has moved away from being a purely consultative
body, and has moved towards being a body with a decisive role to play in
the legislative process of the European Community”, as matters stand (and
stood at the time of the 1994 elections) that Parliament has not in our view
reached a stage where it can of itself properly be regarded as constituting a
legislature. To borrow the words of Professor Dashwood in his inaugural
address at the University of Cambridge in November 1995, “the Community
has no legislature, but a legislative process in which the different political
institutions have different parts to play”. In fact, of the institutions of the
Community it is the Council of Ministers which performs the functions
most closely related to those of a legislature at national level.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents